Join the Blender Physics Game Contest, and win a Sony PSP!
Use the official Blender 2.42 (release candidate) distribution:
http://download.blender.org/release/Blender2.42/
Physics & Vehicle Demos for Blender 2.42 (updated)
http://www.continuousphysics.com/ftp/pu ... view34.zip
Graphics Demos for Blender 2.42, including GLSL Parallax Mapping:
http://www.continuousphysics.com/ftp/pu ... view19.zip
This time some bug fixes, and Bullet is now default, it replaces Sumo.
If you really need Sumo, select Sumo (deprecated) for physics engine.
Physics and Graphics Demos for Blender 2.42
-
Erwin Coumans
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 6:43 pm
- Location: California, USA
Physics and Graphics Demos for Blender 2.42
Last edited by Erwin Coumans on Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:23 pm, edited 29 times in total.
-
RCRuiz
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:05 pm
-
RCRuiz
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:05 pm
Hi Erwin, this is an Alfa from the current cvs wit a new constraint call Rigid Body Joints for preview24
http://rapidshare.de/files/21687856/ble ... a.rar.html
Un Saludo
Edited . . oops . . wrong link
http://rapidshare.de/files/21687856/ble ... a.rar.html
Un Saludo
Edited . . oops . . wrong link
-
pildanovak
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:55 pm
RCRuiz, I looked at it and it's awesome... very nice 
But I don't know if this is a good step in the ui, since there are plans to make blender - engine a plugin, the same with crystalblend. The Blender modeler - animator interface is in combination with game engine already a bit messy - eg in the materials, you can use some features and some not. It' s not bad, because it's much better than doing averything by scripts etc, but my personal opinion is that a single window for (in future external) gameengines might be enough, so the constraint could be better a logic brick. But also the logic bricks should probably not be only the 3 categories which are there now(sensors, controllers, actuators), but a constraint setup could be quite well a Constraint logic brick. Also because sometimes you set/delete constraints dynamically.
But I don't know if this is a good step in the ui, since there are plans to make blender - engine a plugin, the same with crystalblend. The Blender modeler - animator interface is in combination with game engine already a bit messy - eg in the materials, you can use some features and some not. It' s not bad, because it's much better than doing averything by scripts etc, but my personal opinion is that a single window for (in future external) gameengines might be enough, so the constraint could be better a logic brick. But also the logic bricks should probably not be only the 3 categories which are there now(sensors, controllers, actuators), but a constraint setup could be quite well a Constraint logic brick. Also because sometimes you set/delete constraints dynamically.
-
fobsta
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:32 am
- Location: London, United Kingdom