Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum

Hey I admit I only skimmed your thread. I'm not overly interested in java implementations. But you can admit you didn't research the answer to the Orwell question for 4 months.

Well this is clearly off topic, but I'm not sure you have any high ground to stand on if it took you 4 months to find out the title of Orwell's most famous book (besides possibly Animal Farm).

joehot200 wrote:Please read the thread and all the replies before commenting.

Trust me, I did.

joehot200 wrote:(Been wanting support for a while but taken me 4+ months find the answer to the questions so I can register)

Wait, it took you 4 months to find out that the opposite of concave is convex?

You will indeed need some kind of graphics API in order to render graphics. I use Ogre, but there are many choices out there including creating your own renderer using OpenGL or DirectX

Header files don't strictly need to be in the project. Intellisense should find them as long as they are sitting in an include path. Although, I use CMake and it does put the headers into the resulting sln

Doesn't blender integrate bullet softbodies? Not sure since I'm not a blender user.

As I understand, Unity has PhysX 2.X. So various users have noticed substantial speed increases using bullet, though I supposed you would also get a boost from a PhysX 3.x integration. Also you could write a C++ plugin with a pro license.

kinda dissapointed that this still isn't fixed , but thx anyway. The issue *is* fixed. The fix is that you use the internal edge fix on geometry that exhibits this problem. I'm sure a patch that automatically determines whether you are going to require internal edge fixing on a shape would be welco...

I think I read somewhere you can just supply the btBvhTriangleMeshShape with the deformed/moved vertices if nothing was added or removed. But I can't figure out how. I've seen many people think this, but none who ended up with a solution. My understanding is BtOgre borrowed a class from OgreBullet ...

I'm going to go out on a limb with a no, judging by how at least 3 threads in the last few weeks asked a similar question and either got a no or no response. If you need an already-completely-built kinematic controller that accounts for all the myriad situations you might get it into, maybe bullet i...

I use my own dynamic controller and I am fairly happy with it so far.

For a kinematic controller you would have to implement things like moving platforms manually since kinematic objects cannot be influenced by the simulation.

Would probably help if you were more descriptive about the symptoms. What's wrong with the kinematic controller? I don't really use them so I wouldn't know. Have you tried the non-kinematic controller?

You can't do exactly what you want without modifying the library. Would love to proven wrong though and learn something new. Also I think this is a fun thought experiment, but when you get to the implementation the fun will sink out of it really fast.