Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum

V-Cilp may be faster than GJK,but I think enhance GJK algorithm is pretty good.

you mean the contact points generated by the collision right? You can provide a callback that bullet will call during the processing of collision - more information here: http://www.bulletphysics.com/mediawiki-1.5.8/index.php?title=Collision_Callbacks_and_Triggers That is to say that the penetrated...

Hi all
How should i use bullet to return the penetration vertices after performing the ConvexHull verse btBvtTriangleMeshShape collision detection .
I will use it for view frustum occlusion and want to know which vertices in the view frustum accurately.
Thanks
-jiangwei

Hi
Do not use Lemke method to solving LCP,its slow and can not be control.
So PGS or SI (developed by Erin catto)is better choice to solving velocity-level constraints
But i think the position-level theory is the future

Hi all: I had written a console app for test SSE version Vector3,but its crash on line "m_minimum = val" in Region::setMinimum function. The Scalar version has no problem. Why? :( #include "stdafx.h" #include <vector> #include "Region.h" int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* arg...

Is there any open source physics engine which used position based method?
thanks

Good point. We recently discussed this reordering of constraints. Doing a randomize can work in some situations, but opinions vary. Other approaches are sweeping back-and-forwards or sorting them in order of deepest penetration. See the discussion here: http://www.continuousphysics.com/Bullet/phpBB...

Hi All if ((iteration & 7) == 0) { for (i=1; i<m; ++i) { IndexError tmp = order[i]; int swapi = dRandInt2(i+1); order[i] = order[swapi]; order[swapi] = tmp; } } I attentioned this section code which in the "SorLcp.cpp" can improve the stable,but i don't know why. There no papers to dis...

-I meant if you choose an arbitrary direction or align the first tangential direction with the raltive tangential velocity. This might give you better results... remiss of i not to read your post carefully,sorry for my mistake. yes,i used raltive tangential velocity direction as my first tangent di...

Thank you for you reply ! - How many contact points do you generate? every vertex of box. - Do you use SAT or GJK with some kind of manifold like Erwin? Yes. - How do you choose the tangential direction at the contact point / manifold center? Contact point. - How many friction constraints do you def...

Hi all My physics engine used PGS to solve the LCP and use error reduction parameter ,it can run correctly when exist few boxs in physics world ,but when i build a box stack then begin to honrizontal moved and quake. the box stack that collapseed only in 2 second. My question is how to correct this ...

My physics engine used PGS to solve the LCP too,this undesired tangent velocity is also exist in my physics engine
i find OPENTISSUE also have this problem,but it build a first order system to correct this error.

You could use error reduction parameter as OPENTISSUE and ODE did, Add Kerp * 1/delta t * -penetration distance to term b,It can make your box stack stable in vertical direction.

Erwin Coumans wrote:I'm going to write up some whitepaper about this with more in depth explanation.
Erwin

I look forward to your paper.

I knew that ODE with the help of OPCODE which used compressed AABBTree and novodex use PMAP to handle complex vs complex such as cow verus cow.But novodex is getting rid of the PMAP have been mentioned in its document.Erwin recommeded me that decompose the cow in a compound of several convex pieces ...