Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum

Re: Maybe an error in Bender&Trinkle's recent paper?

2012-12-24T00:48:54+00:00

Yes, d(dC/dq H)/dt should be correct, as far as I can tell.

There could be a typo in equation 28 of the paper.

Can you replace the first term of k
Code:
dC/dq dH/dt
by
Code:
d( dC/dq H )/dt
and see if that helps?
Thanks!
Erwin

Statistics: Posted by shikui08 — Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:48 am

Re: Maybe an error in Bender&Trinkle's recent paper?

2012-12-04T19:09:26+00:00

There could be a typo in equation 28 of the paper.

Can you replace the first term of k

Code:

dC/dq dH/dt

Code:

d( dC/dq H )/dt

and see if that helps?
Thanks!
Erwin

Statistics: Posted by Erwin Coumans — Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:09 pm

Maybe an error in Bender&Trinkle's recent paper?

2012-11-18T12:46:06+00:00

I am reading Bender&Trinkle's recent paper ' Interactive Simulation of Rigid Body Dynamics in Computer Graphics' . This paper could be found here : https://code.google.com/p/bullet/downlo ... e=STAR.pdf

The Equation(28) of this paper is slightly different, from equation(20) from an earlier paper from Trinkle 'Formulation of Multibody Dynamics As Complementarity Problems'. PDF version can be found here:https://www.cs.rpi.edu/twiki/pub/Roboti ... detc03.pdf

Both of these equations are derived by differentiating the holonomic constraint twice with respect to t. I can understand equation(20) of the DETC2003 paper with no problem. But equation(28) of Bender&Trinkle's paper, I think it is flawed. Here is my reasoning:https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=98b8c437 ... 7E3E51!672
So, any clue?

Statistics: Posted by shikui08 — Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:46 pm