<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/app.php/feed/topic/372" />

	<title>Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum</title>
	
	<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/index.php" />
	<updated>2006-06-16T21:45:51+00:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum]]></name></author>
	<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/app.php/feed/topic/372</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Erwin Coumans]]></name></author>
		<updated>2006-06-16T21:45:51+00:00</updated>

		<published>2006-06-16T21:45:51+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1180#p1180</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1180#p1180"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[ATI joins the GPU Physics bandwagon]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1180#p1180"><![CDATA[
"Also ATI says they are going to be simply faster than an Ageia PhysX card even with using a X1600 XT and that a X1900 XT should deliver 9 X the performance of an Ageia PhysX card."<br><br><br><a href="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTA3OSwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==" class="postlink">http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.h ... VzaWFzdA==</a><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">Erwin Coumans</a> — Fri Jun 16, 2006 9:45 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
