Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum

P2P Questions (and answers hopefully)

2006-06-13T09:59:52+00:00

p2p means point to point constraint, so yes, it's connection of 2 objects with 1 point, for the bridge you could also use the hinge constraint, which is defined by an axis/common edge of the objects.

Statistics: Posted by pildanovak — Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:59 am

P2P Questions (and answers hopefully)

2006-06-13T04:21:55+00:00

That's very curious. Now I'm confused as to what a constraint actually IS. a point (defined in the code by a local x/y/z coordinate from its axis?) where.... it's simply... connected to another object? That makes probably the most sense.

I'll conquer it yet!

Statistics: Posted by bmud — Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:21 am

P2P Questions (and answers hopefully)

2006-06-12T07:53:00+00:00

hello, you're only using 1 constraints per connection, which is no good . look at the brige I made from yours here :
plant.ffa.vutbr.cz/~novak/dwnflz/constraints.blend

look in the script constraint.py, where are the constraints defined. I reduced the number of objects(was too much, better doing a bridge from more planks in row, than having separate objects for rope pieces, etc.) I was planning to add bridges to my game anyway, so at least I know how to code it now. Look also at the pivot definition, it's important, since it defines the point where the objects get connected...

Hey, I just probably helped my competitor!

Statistics: Posted by pildanovak — Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:53 am

Outta control!

2006-06-12T04:26:21+00:00

I'd like to know if there's a way to reduce or eliminate the spinning in a chain of constrained pieces. Its no good to have the parts of a chain independently spinning length-wise all crazy-like.

if such a thing was possible, i don't think I'd be having nearly as much trouble with this rope bridge

Statistics: Posted by bmud — Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:26 am

Re: P2P Questions (and answers hopefully)

2006-06-03T19:50:44+00:00

I'm going to kick off this with a question of my own. I opened up the demonstration file, attempted to make my own by copying the code into a file of my own. I imagine that documentation will take care of "you need a constraint variable for each axis for each object" blah blah.

I was planning to add a ConstraintActuator, that should make things much simpler. Also, Ramon (rcruiz) is working on setting up constraint within the Blender user interface.

Nevertheless, I noticed that if I use just the demo file, and delete everything except the white "rope" in the top-middle, it doesn't act like a rope when you click on any part. The bottom ball is constrained to its original location. how does one have free ends to simulate something like a hanging rope?

The python script that handles clicking applies the wrong impulse. Will be fixed. Also, you can just remove one constraint, if you want to have a free end to the rope. I'll provide a better rope demo.

Statistics: Posted by Erwin Coumans — Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:50 pm

P2P Questions (and answers hopefully)

2006-06-03T19:40:49+00:00

I'm going to kick off this with a question of my own. I opened up the demonstration file, attempted to make my own by copying the code into a file of my own. I imagine that documentation will take care of "you need a constraint variable for each axis for each object" blah blah.

Nevertheless, I noticed that if I use just the demo file, and delete everything except the white "rope" in the top-middle, it doesn't act like a rope when you click on any part. The bottom ball is constrained to its original location. how does one have free ends to simulate something like a hanging rope?

Statistics: Posted by bmud — Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:40 pm