<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/app.php/feed/topic/352" />

	<title>Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum</title>
	
	<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/index.php" />
	<updated>2006-06-04T20:14:55+00:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum]]></name></author>
	<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/app.php/feed/topic/352</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Icoxo]]></name></author>
		<updated>2006-06-04T20:14:55+00:00</updated>

		<published>2006-06-04T20:14:55+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1126#p1126</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1126#p1126"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Bounds: Polyheder; Request]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1126#p1126"><![CDATA[
Not to worry though, you can simply expand the game with the new machines when the first preview with compounds in it comes out (which will probably be before the official 2.43 release)<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=421">Icoxo</a> — Sun Jun 04, 2006 8:14 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[goldentaiji]]></name></author>
		<updated>2006-05-29T03:45:01+00:00</updated>

		<published>2006-05-29T03:45:01+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1105#p1105</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1105#p1105"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Bounds: Polyheder; Request]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1105#p1105"><![CDATA[
<img class="smilies" src="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" width="15" height="15" alt=":(" title="Sad"> Ahh 2.43 was his projected date.  Lol, I was looking for it because it'd allow me to make some cooler extra machines (The Incredible Machine style) for the bullet demo contest.  <br><br>Well, I'll just have to wait to play around with the extra collision bound feature then.  Less machines to play with in 2.42 demo then.<br><br>Jason LIn<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=346">goldentaiji</a> — Mon May 29, 2006 3:45 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Icoxo]]></name></author>
		<updated>2006-05-27T23:52:34+00:00</updated>

		<published>2006-05-27T23:52:34+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1103#p1103</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1103#p1103"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Bounds: Polyheder; Request]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1103#p1103"><![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.continuousphysics.com/Bullet/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=322" class="postlink">http://www.continuousphysics.com/Bullet ... .php?t=322</a><br><br>Here and in other topics he hints at compound-convex in the coming months, so keep your eyes peeled.[/quote]<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=421">Icoxo</a> — Sat May 27, 2006 11:52 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[goldentaiji]]></name></author>
		<updated>2006-05-27T03:22:26+00:00</updated>

		<published>2006-05-27T03:22:26+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1098#p1098</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1098#p1098"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Bounds: Polyheder; Request]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1098#p1098"><![CDATA[
<img class="smilies" src="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" width="15" height="15" alt=":D" title="Very Happy"> Wow, that's great news Icoxo.  Hehe, but where are you getting the info from?  Probably straight from Erwin himself, but is there a place where planned features are posted?<br><br>Jason Lin<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=346">goldentaiji</a> — Sat May 27, 2006 3:22 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Icoxo]]></name></author>
		<updated>2006-05-26T23:17:43+00:00</updated>

		<published>2006-05-26T23:17:43+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1097#p1097</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1097#p1097"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Bounds: Polyheder; Request]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1097#p1097"><![CDATA[
In the coming months there will be the ability to use any number of convex bodies to form the bounds of a physics object. So as to simulate having a concave object react realistically. Like a L shaped body would have two box bounds comprise its collision bounds and it will act as if collision was precise.<br><br>These "compounds" would allow you to have your bucket, and pickup trucks, and donuts, and horseshoes ect...<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=421">Icoxo</a> — Fri May 26, 2006 11:17 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[goldentaiji]]></name></author>
		<updated>2006-05-26T04:11:55+00:00</updated>

		<published>2006-05-26T04:11:55+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1092#p1092</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1092#p1092"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Bounds: Polyheder; Request]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1092#p1092"><![CDATA[
I've started rigging up tests in anticipation of the bullet contest.  All in all, bullet is extremely great when compared to sumo and the physics simulations are awesome.<br><br> <img class="smilies" src="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" width="15" height="15" alt=":D" title="Very Happy"> But we always push for better and better things.  In sumo, there was a bounds called Polyheder.  Although it didn't function well, I miss that extra bound option.  Polyheder allowed you to make say a dynamic cup and have a ball fall into it, with all physics interactions possible.  With polyheder in bullet, it can open up more physic simulation possibilities.<br><br>Umm... if there's already an option that achieves this, I haven't seen any with the desired affects.<br><br>Jason Lin<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=346">goldentaiji</a> — Fri May 26, 2006 4:11 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
