Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum

[Solved] Benchmarking - segment/triangles

2009-02-05T17:12:49+00:00

It was my fault, I gave a vertexStride with the gmtl vectors size instead of the btVector3.. so there was a problem with the triangle array of course..

It works great now !

Thanks,
Thomas

Statistics: Posted by Mitox — Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:12 pm

Re: Benchmarking - segment/triangles

2009-02-03T20:20:49+00:00

I've got some incoherent results reporting collision

The rayTest should work in most cases, except for degenerate triangles or extreme ray length.
Can you provide a reproduction case that shows the incoherent results in one of the Bullet demos?

Thanks,
Erwin

Statistics: Posted by Erwin Coumans — Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:20 pm

Re: Benchmarking - segment/triangles

2009-02-03T14:31:11+00:00

I'm coming back about my benchmarking !

I integrated bullet in my application following the example of "ConcaveRaycastDemo", but I've got some incoherent results reporting collision when there is none (just sometimes not everytime, that's the most disturbing..).

So my questions are :
- Does the "raytest" works fine when the ray is totally included in a closed triangulated environment ?
- Is there some conditions on the ray, about the length maybe ?

Some particularity of my code (even if I don't think it can be part of my problem) :
- each vertex appears in the btTriangleIndexVertexArray multiple times (each time there is a triangle they are a part of)

Thanks again,

Thomas

Statistics: Posted by Mitox — Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:31 pm

Re: Benchmarking - segment/triangles

2009-01-23T08:31:36+00:00

I'm doing continuous collision detection with particles, and I interpolate the trajectory by a line to find if there was a hit point during the displacement.
From what you told me I think the btCollisionWorld::btRayTest match what I want
(I assumed the continuous detection collision in bullet only considered triangles/triangles intersection as other libraries do, so the triangle/triangle intersection tests would be "overevaluated" compared to the method I want to benchmark)

Thanks,

Thomas

Statistics: Posted by Mitox — Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:31 am

Re: Benchmarking - segment/triangles

2009-01-22T20:24:26+00:00

The btCollisionWorld::btRayTest is actually a segment with a start and end, and it returns the first hit and hit point/normal.

This is different from a segment/triangle test, that returns the penetration depth/normal. You can use a btMultiSphereShape with 2 spheres of radius 0 (and set collision margon to zero) to emulate a ray segment for this test.

What kind of query do you perform between segment and triangle? hit fraction or penetration depth?
Thanks,
Erwin

Statistics: Posted by Erwin Coumans — Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:24 pm

Benchmarking - segment/triangles

2009-01-20T12:04:40+00:00

Hello (I don't now if I choose the best location to post.. but I hope so !)

I would like to make a benchmark between bullet and an other collision detection algorithm. I just would like to know if bullet has the possibility to test : segment - triangles collision.
From my first contact with bullet I saw "Raycast" may -kind of- suit for my tests, but in my situation the ray has only a limited length, is there some Demo/code I should look at for a more precise benchmark ?

Thank you in advance for any answer !

Statistics: Posted by Mitox — Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:04 pm