<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/app.php/feed/topic/145" />

	<title>Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum</title>
	
	<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/index.php" />
	<updated>2005-10-09T16:22:17+00:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum]]></name></author>
	<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/app.php/feed/topic/145</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></name></author>
		<updated>2005-10-09T16:22:17+00:00</updated>

		<published>2005-10-09T16:22:17+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=366#p366</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=366#p366"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[What solution will succeed on the PC for physics]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=366#p366"><![CDATA[
From <a href="http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showthread.php?t=23948" class="postlink">http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showthread.php?t=23948</a> :<br><br>33.93%  GPGPU model in DX10 (e.g. MEMEXPORT)     <br>10.71%  GPUs will solve this problem in DX11 or later    <br>14.29%  Physics Processing Unit (PPU) or other addin device    <br>39.29%  New CPU features (vector/FP cores or coprocessors)<br>8.93%    Other (please explain) <br>19.64%  The PC wont adapt to this problem outside its current course <br><br><br>"Havok allready has good market share and will look pretty bad next to hardware accelerated physics from it's competitor. So It may be in their best interest to give ATI or Nvidia a call."<p>Statistics: Posted by Guest — Sun Oct 09, 2005 4:22 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
