1. project the penetrating point normal on the surface
2. adjust the speed: v = vT - beta*vN
3. adjust the force: F = F - µ*FN*vT/||vT||
T and N stand for the tranversal and normal component, beta is 0 for inelastic collision and 1 for fully elastic collision and µ is the friction coefficient.
I recently found that a penalty force F = k*d (d the penetration distance)method gives a better result, as in the tension profile is smoother. However I have a few questions regarding this:
1. How best to choose k?
2. Is there a maximum/minimum limit to k?
3. What about adding damping?
Concerning question 2, I thought the maximum would be determined by the CFL (Courant Friedrichs Levy if I remember correctly) criterion and be limited to E/deltal with E the elasticity modulus of my yarn and deltal the yarn grid size, but upon simulation this doesn't seem to be the case.
Concerning question 3, I tried modelling surface contact using a spring damper system. From underdamped systems I then find a value for the viscosity of my damper, using the mathematical requirement that the speed when a yarn node bumps off the surface again needs to be equal to the original speed times beta, in the opposite direction. If beta equals 0 however, this means that it may take almost forever for the node to be lying on the surface again. Is there a better way to resolve with a certain damping?Statistics: Posted by SimonDM — Fri Jun 15, 2007 3:19 pm
]]>