<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/app.php/feed/topic/10016" />

	<title>Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum</title>
	
	<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/index.php" />
	<updated>2014-07-18T01:23:54+00:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Real-Time Physics Simulation Forum]]></name></author>
	<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/app.php/feed/topic/10016</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[stkeg]]></name></author>
		<updated>2014-07-18T01:23:54+00:00</updated>

		<published>2014-07-18T01:23:54+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=33697#p33697</id>
		<link href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=33697#p33697"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[good alternative FEM physics engine?]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=33697#p33697"><![CDATA[
was using bullet for doing FEM simulations. i noticed that maybe softbodies/FEM tetrahedral sims aren't as robust (probably because less time has been spent on development as compared to rigid bodies)<br><br>i was trying to make the softbodies more rigid. when i did that, i got unstability. i think the sim was exploding (the geomtry/tetras would dissapear)<br><br>also collisions didn't work as well, with a lot of interpenetrations.<br><br>are there any other FEM physics engines that can handle tetrahedral elements well?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pybullet.org/Bullet/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=10919">stkeg</a> — Fri Jul 18, 2014 1:23 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
